The challenge for me is to not seem to be holding a positive tone when no data supports it. But here goes.
We came into last week with weak cash reports, which continued on Monday. By Wednesday, those few transactions had disappeared, and some mills were actually reporting better days. Items like 9′ tightened up.
So, while this is far from a roaring commitment to getting long, it does suggest there is a fight to find a bottom.
Today’s strategies and cycles are not very sophisticated. Run inventories down to the dirt and be forced to buy something. Buy when inventories get low, then sell into the rally. That is how many companies profit today. There is no glamour and very little margin in it.
At the moment, inventories are not at panic levels, so the trade is only cautiously looking at the market. The focus now shifts to the September expiration and whether there will be a debacle or not.
This is a difficult time of year to get bearish. The next round, which could also be the last meaningful move of the year, starts to define itself in early September. The trade has time to wait it out, and it likely will. I just do not see that process lasting through the traditional seasonal lows in October. It is simply not that bad out there.
The funds added another 1,000 contracts during the latest reporting period. At roughly 6,300 shorts, it appears they are once again fully invested. Open interest was stagnant to lower throughout the week, suggesting they were not adding to positions.
If that is the case, future selling pressure will likely have to come from a weakening cash market rather than another wave of fund activity. What the 6,300 figure also tells us is that the spread trade is alive and well again.
If the market reaches early October with a high level of indifference, there is at least a case to be made that a soft long bias could emerge from the roll. For now, that remains a possibility rather than a forecast, but it is something worth watching as expiration approaches.
Technical:
The technical picture is becoming well defined. The November contract appears to be building a bottom between 548.00 and 573.50. A break below 548.00 would be very destructive and would likely force a reassessment of the broader outlook. The upper trading range sits between 573.50 and 589.25. Those levels define the current trading boundaries. With the stochastics turning positive, it would take a considerable amount of selling pressure to drive the market through 548.00. By comparison, it would not take much to push futures through 589.25. A round of short covering alone could accomplish that.
Again, I am not trying to sound positive. But after a $100 correction and with much of the trade firmly in the “going to zero” camp, futures may finally be in a position to put up a fight.
Daily Bulletin:
https://www.cmegroup.com/daily_bulletin/current/Section23_Lumber_Options.pdf
Southern Yellow Pine:
https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/lumber-and-softs/southern-yellow-pine.volume.html
The Commitment of Traders:
https://www.cftc.gov/dea/futures/other_lf.htm
About the Leonard Report:
The Leonard Lumber Report is a column that focuses on the lumber futures market’s highs and lows and everything else in between. Our very own, Brian Leonard, risk analyst, will provide weekly commentary on the industry’s wood product sectors.
Brian Leonard
bleonard@rcmam.com
312-761-263


Soybeans have been the quieter half of the row-crop rally, caught between a bearish crop tour number and relentless Chinese demand. The August WASDE actually raised the national yield estimate to 53 bushels per acre and left ending stocks at a comfortable 320 million bushels, but the Pro Farmer Crop Tour turned more cautious on beans, projecting a crop of 4.572 billion bushels on a 53.3 bushel yield, a number the trade read as modestly bearish relative to corn’s tightening story. What has kept beans supported is demand: China has been buying almost daily since mid-August, with a single week’s net sales reaching 2.48 million metric tons, up 44% from the week before, as Beijing works toward the 25-million-metric-ton annual purchase commitment struck at May’s Trump-Xi summit in Beijing. A follow-up meeting between the two leaders is anticipated in September and remains a watch item for a fresh round of buying. Crush margins have stayed historically strong and continue to underpin the nearby contracts even as the funds have leaned more heavily into corn. With China’s buying pace this consistent, beans have a demand story that’s hard to ignore even if the yield picture isn’t as bullish as corn’s.




















